These are 4 Legal Cases that Have Befallen the Elderly in Indonesia

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "The Case of Fake Doctors in Indonesian Soccer", "Case of Boredom at Work", "Contoh Permohonan Pengampuan (Curatele)", you may read also "10 Mega-Corruption Cases with the Largest Losses in Indonesia" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'These are 4 Legal Cases that have Befallen the Elderly in Indonesia'.

A 68-year-old grandfather named Samirin in North Sumatra was sentenced to 2 months and 4 days in prison by the Simalungun Court, Wednesday (15/1/2020). Samirin was convicted after being found guilty of picking up remaining rubber tree sap on a plantation owned by PT Bridgestone. He was proven to have taken 1.9 kilograms of latex which, if converted into rupiah, was around Rp. 17,000. He will sell the sap to sap collectors in order to get money. However, he had not even left the garden area, an officer caught him and took him to the security post. The company also reported it to the police.[1]

Samirin admitted to the judge that he did this because he needed money to buy cigarettes. Legal cases involving the elderly did not only affect Samirin's grandfather. Sad stories about elderly people who have had trouble with the law have happened several times. Here are some of them:[2]

1. The case of Grandma Saulina. Still from North Sumatra, on January 29 last year, a grandmother named Saulina Boru Sitorus (92) was sentenced to 1 month and 14 days by a judge at the Balige District Court, Toba Samosir. The woman who is familiarly called Opung Linda cut down a 5-inch diameter durian tree belonging to her relative, Japaya Sitorus (70), because she wanted to build a grave for her ancestor. However, the judge's decision was questioned because the witnesses presented were the children and wife of the complainant himself. In fact, the people around the site have never seen Japaya plant the durian tree in question. He admitted that he had apologized to Japaya, but he asked for hundreds of millions of rupiah in compensation as a form of peace. Saulina was unable to fulfill the request and finally reported it to the police. Not alone, Saulina's six children were also detained, each of whom was imprisoned for 4 months and 10 days deducted from the prison term.
2. The case of Grandma Asyani. Asyani (70), a resident of Krastal Hamlet, Jatibanteng Village, Jatibanteng District, Situbondo was jailed on December 15 2014. She was found guilty of stealing 7 teak wood that her husband cut down from land Perhutani said was his. Even though he felt that the land was his own, and did not belong to the state-owned company's land. As a result of this, Grandmother Asyani was sentenced to 15 years in prison. However, his party submitted a request for suspension which was granted by the court, so he was declared free on March 16, 2015. Previously, he was already afraid of the threat of punishment that he would receive. "I'm afraid because I want to be sentenced to 15 years in prison, what will happen to me. I can't sleep well. I'm old like this," said Asyani using the regional language.
3. The Case of the Anjol Hasim and Jamilu Nani Couples. Furthermore, the elderly who also stumbled on legal cases in their old age were a husband and wife from Tenggela Village, Tilango District, Gorontalo Regency. They are Anjol Hasim (75) and Jamilu Nani (80) who were proven guilty of stealing 6 bamboo sticks. Both were sentenced to 20 days in city detention as a result of this case. However, the judge only sentenced him to a violation of destroying someone else's area and not an article on theft. That's because the bamboo trees they cut down are actually on their own land that has been sold to other parties. This statement is shown by the sale and purchase agreement.
4. The case of Minah's grandmother. Finally, a legal case involving an elderly person occurred in Banyumas Regency, Central Java. She is Granny Minah (55) who was accused of stealing 3 cocoa pods from PT. RSA worth IDR 2,000. In October 2009, he was sentenced to 6 months in prison. The case was handled by the Purwokerto District Attorney. However, he did not immediately stay in prison and could still work in the garden as usual, as long as the sentence had not been handed down. He has apologized to the company foreman who reported his actions to the police. Minah asked the foreman to bring back the cocoa pods she had brought before. Minah admitted that she did not know that her actions violated the rules, which made her have to deal with the law to that extent.

And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Selain Kakek Samirin, Ini 4 Kasus Hukum yang Sempat Menimpa Lansia", www.kompas.com., Diakses pada tanggal 29 Januari 2023, Link: https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/01/18/213315465/selain-kakek-samirin-ini-4-kasus-hukum-yang-sempat-menimpa-lansia

2. Ibid.

The Case of Fake Doctors in Indonesian Soccer

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "The Murder Case of Anjani Bee, which is Still a Mystery", "Sperm Theft Case", "Knowing Red Notice and its Request Procedure", "These 5 Types of Online Fraud You Should Avoid" you may read also "What Are The Competences of The Religious Courts To Adjudicates In Sharia Economic Cases?" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'The Case of Fake Doctors in Indonesian Soccer'.

Police are still hunting for former PSS Sleman team doctor Elwizan Aminudin. As is known, the man who is usually called Amin was exposed as a fake doctor. Sleman Police Chief AKBP Wachyu Tri Budi said the police had summoned Amin for the investigation process. However, Amin did not answer the call and disappeared. Amin is still at large.[1]

"We called/summons (Amin) but apparently he didn't come, and it is suspected that he is now outside the area. We are currently looking for him. He is a DPO (People Search List)," said Wachyu at the Sleman Police Headquarters. So far, continued Wachyu, the police have examined a number of witnesses. Neither from the management of PSS Sleman nor asking for information from the Syiah Kuala Aceh University where Amin claimed to have studied.[2]

From there, the police have also secured several pieces of evidence such as a contract with PSS Sleman and a statement from the university. "We have examined 5 witnesses, both from related management and also evidence that we have secured related to the certificate in question, including a statement from the University of Syiah Kuala stating that the person concerned is not a student from there and several other pieces of evidence" he (Wachyu) said.[3]

The police suspect that Amin is currently outside Java Island. Therefore, his party deployed a special team to hunt down Amin. "We are trying to find the person concerned. We will secure it first because his position is outside the island," said the former Head of the Bantul Police.[4] Previously it was reported that PSS Sleman management finally took legal action and officially reported Elwizan Aminudin to the Sleman Police. Elwizan recently shocked the Indonesian football public when he was exposed as a fake doctor.[5] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Polisi Buru Elwizan Aminudin, Dokter Gadungan di PSS Sleman", sport.detik.com., Diakses pada tanggal 29 Januari 2023, Link: https://sport.detik.com/sepakbola/liga-indonesia/d-5857741/polisi-buru-elwizan-aminudin-dokter-gadungan-di-pss-sleman

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

5. Ibid.

The Murder Case of Anjani Bee, which is Still a Mystery

 

(Suara.com)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Unique Case, Accounts of Bird Sellers in Madura Blocked by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)", "No Name and No Game Case: A Hilarious But True Court Cases You Won’t Believe", "These 5 Types of Online Fraud You Should Avoid", you may read also "5 Interesting Cases that Become the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in Indonesia" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'The Murder Case of Anjani Bee, which is Still a Mystery'.

It's been nearly nine months since the death of Marwah Sofiyah alias 'Anjani Bee' whose body was found in the ditch in front of the hotel in Lembang, West Bandung, last March 5 has not yet been revealed. The body of the woman with the 'owl' tattoo, who is a resident of Karajan Village, Karang Hegar Village, Pabuaran District, Subang Regency, was found horribly, covered in sheets and black plastic. Police found a neck wound and bruises on the face.[1]

AKBP (Adjutant chief commissioner of police) M. Yoris Maulana Yusuf Marzuki, who at that time served as the Head of the Cimahi Police, said that this case was difficult to uncover because of a lack of evidence. "We lack witnesses and there is no CCTV at the location where the bodies were disposed of. So we cannot direct the perpetrators of the disposal and murder of the victim," Yoris said, Sunday (26/7/20'). In this incident, the police have examined more than 100 witnesses, including the online taxi driver who last took the victim. "We have examined nearly 120 people but none have been conclusive. We have tried to break all their alibis, but it is still not clear. We have examined all of our close friends, girlfriends and family," said Yoris.[2]

Apart from that, the police also received information that the day before the unfortunate incident, Anjani Bee had met a man in front of a hotel in the city of Bandung. The police immediately checked the list of guests staying the day Anjani Bee met the mysterious man, but nothing. "We have checked all the hotel rooms and even checked one by one the list of guests who stayed that day and the previous day. But nothing leads to the suspected man we are after," he explained. Finally, on November 6, 2020, the Police still have not received any developments regarding this case.[3]

Head of the Cimahi Police Criminal Investigation Unit (Kasatreskrim): AKP (Assistant commissioner of police) Yohannes Redhoi Sigiro said that until now his party was still carrying out developments. But there has been no result that can bring it closer to the perpetrators of this sadistic murder. "Until now, we are still continuing to investigate where, who, and when the victim was killed. But indeed there has been no significant progress," Yohannes said when contacted by detik.com. According to him, it is suspected that the perpetrators of the Anjanii Bee murder were more than one person and were highly trained because the murder was carried out in a very neat manner so that they could disguise the traces of the perpetrators. "Our suspicion is that there was more than one person and was organised. There were different roles for the perpetrators, from those who executed them to those who disposed of the victims. But we are continuing to make efforts to uncover this case," he concluded.[4] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia territory, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Misteri Pembunuhan Anjanii Bee-Mayat Perempuan Terbungkus Karung", news.detik.com., Diakses pada tanggal 29 Januari 2023, Link: https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-barat/d-5316432/misteri-pembunuhan-anjanii-bee-mayat-perempuan-terbungkus-karung

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

Unique Case, Accounts of Bird Sellers in Madura Blocked by the Corruption Eradication Commission

 

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "The New Criminal Code Has Been Passed As Law, Will Be Effective 3 Years Later", "Mengenal Taufiequrachman Ruki, Ketua KPK Pertama", "The 4 Weirdest Judges' Verdicts" you may read also "List of 100 Regional Heads Affected by Corruption Cases by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'Unique Case, Accounts of Bird Sellers in Madura Blocked by the Corruption Eradication Commission'.

This bird seller on Madura Island suddenly couldn't access the money in the bank account where he kept the money. Apparently, there is the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) which ordered the blocking of the bird trader's account in Pamekasan. The account that was 'blocked by the KPK' was a BCA (Central Asia Bank) account belonging to a bird seller from Buddih Village, Pademawu District, Pamekasan, named Ilham Wahyudi. Ilham himself only found out about the blocking when he went to the BCA Pamekasan Branch office, Wednesday (25/1/2023).[1]

In the excerpt of the letter issued by BCA dated January 16 2023 it is stated: Based on a request from the Corruption Eradication Commission as referred to in letter R/35/DAK.01.00/20-23/01/2023, January 11, 2023 regarding opening a blocked account on behalf of Ilham Wahyudi on January 13, 2023. Based on that letter, BCA finally blocked Ilham's account. He can not withdraw money but can receive incoming money. When contacted by detikJatim, Ilham said he was confused and disappointed. He even emphasized that he had never accepted a big, strange project. "I never got any project," said Ilham.[2]

Account Name is the Same as the Name of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Suspect

Ilham's BCA account was blocked because he has the same name as one of the suspects in the East Java (East Java) Provincial Government grants corruption case. "The information we obtained, the name and date of birth of the person concerned happened to be the same as the name of the KPK suspect who submitted a blocking request. The differentiating data is in the address," said Head of KPK Reporting Unit Ali Fikri when contacted, Friday (27/1/2023).[3]

In fact, the bird seller's balance was only IDR 2 million. "My balance so far is just over two million," Ilham told, Thursday (26/1/2023).[4]

From the latest information that the author got from one of the online media, that the block regarding this case has been lifted. Things like this could happen. Case closed. And if you have any legal issue with this topic, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Rekening Rp 2 Juta Diblokir KPK, Pedagang Burung Teriak Salah Apa", news.detik.com., Diakses pada tanggal 29 Januari 2023, Link: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6536507/rekening-rp-2-juta-diblokir-kpk-pedagang-burung-teriak-salah-apa

2. Ibid.

3. "Rekening Diblokir, Nama Pedagang Burung Ternyata Sama dengan Tersangka KPK", news.detik.com., Diakses pada tanggal 29 Januari 2023, Link: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6537021/rekening-diblokir-nama-pedagang-burung-ternyata-sama-dengan-tersangka-kpk

4. "Terungkap! Ini Alasan Rekening Pedagang Burung Madura Sempat Diblokir", news.detik.com., Diakses pada tanggal 29 Januari 2023, Link: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6536848/terungkap-ini-alasan-rekening-pedagang-burung-madura-sempat-diblokir

The New Criminal Code Has Been Passed As Law, Will Be Effective 3 Years Later

 

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "5 Interesting Cases that Become the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in Indonesia", "Customs Foreclosure Fraud 2022 Sets Record, Losses Exceed IDR 8.3 Billion!", "Corruption offenses in the Criminal Code", you may read also "Various Legal Basis of Defamation According to Indonesia Law" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'The New Criminal Code Has Been Passed As Law, Will Be Effective 3 Years Later'.

The New Criminal Code

President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) passed Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP). The new Criminal Code is Jokowi's first legal product to be inaugurated this year. This law was passed in Jakarta today by President Jokowi. And this law was promulgated in Jakarta by Minister of State Secretary Pratikno.[1]

This new Criminal Code contains 624 articles, as well as replacing the Dutch colonial Criminal Code. In addition, the new Criminal Code also codifies a number of other laws. In Article 623 (Chapter XXXVII regarding closing provisions) of RI Law Number 1/2023, it is written 'This law may be referred to as the Criminal Code'.[2]

Will Be Effective 3 Years Later

In Article 624 in 'Chapter XXXVII closing provisions', there is an explanation regarding the time when the new Criminal Code will come into force. "This Law shall come into effect after 3 (three) years from the date of promulgation," reads Article 624. This means that the new Criminal Code will come into effect on January 2, 2026.[3] And if you have any legal issue in Indonesia, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "KUHP Baru Jadi UU Pertama di 2023 yang Diteken Jokowi", news.detik.com., Audrey Santoso, Diakses pada tanggal 28 Januari 2023, Link: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6495235/kuhp-baru-jadi-uu-pertama-di-2023-yang-diteken-jokowi

2. Ibid.

3. "KUHP Baru Diteken Jokowi Resmi Jadi UU, Berlaku 3 Tahun Lagi", news.detik.com., Audrey Santoso, Diakses pada tanggal 28 Januari 2023, Link: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6495179/kuhp-baru-diteken-jokowi-resmi-jadi-uu-berlaku-3-tahun-lagi

5 Interesting Cases that Become the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in Indonesia

 

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "The Characteristics of a Fraudulent Investment According to the Financial Services Authority (OJK)", "Examples of Fraudulent Spam Emails", "Understanding 5 Steps Foreign Direct Investment In Indonesia" you may read also "How To Report Online Scammer Or Fraud To The Police In Indonesia" and on this occasion we will discuss about '5 Interesting Cases that Become the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in Indonesia'.

Have you ever traded with an element of 'coercion'? If so, you can sue because the sale and purchase can be cancelled. The above is 1 out of 5 cases that became the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (MA). As reported by the Supreme Court clerk, Monday (25/6/2012) the following five decisions are decisions that can be used as guidelines for judges in deciding similar cases:[1]

1. Buying and selling with elements of coercion. The case began when Budi Haliman Halim, who is the legal owner of the educational institution Arise Shine Ces. Later, on August 8, 2006, the Hwa Ing Fonds Foundation and Lo Iwan Setia Dharma policed ​​Budi on charges of copyright infringement. This report was followed up by detaining Budi. While in detention, the Hwa Ing Fonds Foundation forced Budi to sell the brand for IDR 400 million, while it was agreed to sell the brand to Lo Iwan Setia Dharma for IDR 400 million. Although recently, the IDR 400 million was never paid. As for the punishment, the Hwa Ing Fonds Foundation and Lo Iwan Setia Dharma have reconciled and have not continued the report. Is the sale and purchase of the brand legal? According to the Supreme Court, this is illegal and null and void. The Supreme Court assessed that at the time the sale and purchase agreement was drawn up, Budi was being held by the police because of reports from the Hwa Ing Fonds Foundation and Lo Iwan Setia Dharma to put pressure on Budi to make or approve the sale and purchase agreement. This is a 'Misbruik van Omstandigheiden' which can result in the agreement being cancelled, because it no longer fulfills the elements of Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely that there is no free will on the part of the plaintiff.
2. Divorce Does Not Eliminate Debt. Divorce has many legal consequences. One of them is debts that occur when the marriage bond is still ongoing. If a husband and wife divorce, then whose debt is borne? Answering the above, the Supreme Court took the example of a divorce that occurred at the Religious Court (PA) Semarang. A husband and wife in 2003 had a debt of IDR 1 billion. Later they divorced resulting in a dispute over who bears the debt. Then on September 6, 2008 the Supreme Court made a decision that the debt was repaid from mixed assets. "The Supreme Court is of the opinion that the debts made by the parties while the marriage was in progress, these debts become a joint burden and responsibility, so the confiscation of collateral for joint assets (gono-gini) is valid and valuable," said the Supreme Court.
3. Regional Head Election Case at the Constitutional Court (MK). People are always looking for 'legal loopholes'. Dissatisfaction with the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) was no exception, which was finally brought to the general court. The case began when Dirwan Mahmud became a participant in the South Bengkulu post-conflict local election. In the first round, Dirwan won because he got 51.7 percent of the vote. However, this was canceled by the Constitutional Court because Dirwan had been convicted of a crime in 1985. Then, the Dirwan also challenged the Constitutional Court's decision to the Manna District Court, Bengkulu, so that the Constitutional Court's decision was null and void and must be considered as never having existed. This attempt was rejected by PN Manna and MA. What is the reason for MA? "The Supreme Court has no authority to evaluate and examine the Constitutional Court's decision. Even though the Supreme Court can understand the problem faced by the Dirwan, namely that the person concerned is not allowed to take part in the post-conflict local election, it is as if the Dirwan has had a civil death. However, in carrying out its authority as a general judicial institution, the Supreme Court cannot make corrections or test a decision from another Judicial institution such as the Supreme Court," wrote the Supreme Court decision.
4. Auction upon Auction. The case began when a house dispute occurred at Jalan Panjaitan No 153 A Medan, North Sumatra as a result of a struggle over an inheritance. Then the house was bought by Hassan Chandra in 1982. Later this case had a long tail. Both the heirs and Hassan filed an executional confiscation of the house. There were two court decisions ordering the execution of the auction. What is the attitude of the MA? "Cancellation of an auction that has been carried out based on a decision that has permanent legal force cannot be cancelled," said the Supreme Court. According to the Supreme Court, the buyer of the auction against the disputed object based on the Minutes of Auction and the Minutes of Auction which is based on a decision that has permanent legal force is an auction buyer who has good intentions and therefore must be protected. "If at a later date there is a decision that contradicts a decision that has permanent legal force and states that the decision that has permanent legal force is not binding, then that decision cannot be used as a reason to cancel the auction. What can be done is to demand compensation for the object of dispute from the applicant. auction," said MA.
5. Journalist Organizational Disputes. The case began when the West Papua branch of the Association of Indonesian Journalists (PWI) broke up to hold a 'Munaslub'. Then the losing party sued the Manokwari District Court to lose. Not accepting it, the losing side made an appeal to the Jayapura High Court on December 11 2009 and granted the appeal. Then the case went to the Supreme Court and on November 18 2010 it was decided by granting an appeal to amend the Manokwari District Court decision. What is the reason for MA? "The Supreme Court is of the opinion that if there is a crisis within PWI because the settlement has been regulated in the AD/ART and the Journalistic Code of Ethics, and is accounted for in the congress, then the crisis cannot be assessed as an unlawful act as referred to in Article 1365 of the Civil Code," said the Supreme Court clerk, Soeroso Ono.

And if you have any legal issue with this topic, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "5 Kasus Menarik yang Jadi Yurisprudensi MA", news.detik.com., Diakses pada tanggal 27 Januari 2023, Link: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1950026/5-kasus-menarik-yang-jadi-yurisprudensi-ma.

The Characteristics of a Fraudulent Investment According to the Financial Services Authority (OJK)

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "Examples of Fraudulent Spam Emails", "Sharia Investment: Definition, Characteristics, Types, and Benefits", "Understanding 5 Steps Foreign Direct Investment In Indonesia" you may read also "How To Report Online Scammer Or Fraud To The Police In Indonesia" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'The Characteristics of a Fraudulent Investment According to the Financial Services Authority (OJK)'. The Financial Services Authority (OJK) has issued a warning against fraudulent investments. So that you don't get caught in the lure of bogus investment offers, here are the characteristics:[1]

1. Promises big profits in a short time.
2. Investment products and business processes are not clear.
3. Offer commissions or bonuses for recruiting new members.
4. The return on investment is stuck in the middle.
5. Does not have official permission.

In order not to get caught in fraudulent investments, the Financial Services Authority (OJK) provides the following tips:[2]

1. Legal: Check the company and its investment products, whether they have official permission from the authorized institution.
2. Logical: Check the investment product being offered, whether it makes sense or not.

And if you have any legal issue with this topic, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

References:

1. "Waspada Investasi bodong! Ini ciri-cirinya", finance.detik.com., Diakses pada tanggal 27 Januari 2023, Link: https://finance.detik.com/infografis/d-6525085/waspada-investasi-bodong-ini-ciri-cirinya

2. Ibid.

Examples of Fraudulent Spam Emails

(iStock)

By:

Team of Hukumindo

Previously, the www.hukumindo.com platform has talk about "The 4 Weirdest Judges' Verdicts", "Customs Foreclosure Fraud 2022 Sets Record, Losses Exceed IDR 8.3 Billion!", "How To Report Online Scammer Or Fraud To The Police In Indonesia", "Beware of Scams Impersonating Love", "Elements of the Fraud According to Indonesia Criminal Law" you may read also "What Is the Difference Between Fraud and Embezzlement Under Indonesian Law?" and on this occasion we will discuss about 'Examples of Fraudulent Spam Emails'.

Our platform has covered many articles related to fraud on the internet. Please click on the link above. One of the modes used for fraud on the internet is to send an email whose actual content is "to good to be true". Examples are as follows:[1]

(dokumen pribadi)

Note: Google just flags email like this in red, which means it's dangerous. You should not be provoked by emails like this. And if you have any legal issue with this topic, contact us then, feel free in 24 hour, we will be happy to assist you. 

*) For further information please contact:

Mahmud Kusuma Advocate

Law Office

Jakarta - Indonesia.

E-mail: mahmudkusuma22@gmail.com

________________

Reference:

1. Dokumen pribadi.